Chamber of Deputies debates LGBTQIA+ topics in schools

On Tuesday, the Chamber of Deputies hosted a rare dual debate, discussing two petitions that presented opposing views on the same issue: whether LGBTQIA+ topics should be addressed in public schools.

The first petition argued that LGBTQIA+ topics should either be excluded from school curricula or introduced only after students reach a certain age. In contrast, the second petition called for greater inclusion of these topics, particularly at younger ages. The unusual format of the session allowed both petitioners to present their arguments consecutively, followed by responses from government officials.

The debate centred on the role of public education. Steve Schmitz, the petitioner opposing the inclusion of LGBTQIA+ topics in schools, emphasised parental authority, arguing that decisions about when and how children encounter such topics should rest solely with families. Schmitz contended that schools should focus on equipping students with practical skills for future employment, leaving matters like "love, empathy, and respect" to parents.

In stark contrast, petitioner Marc Gerges advocated for greater inclusion of LGBTQIA+ topics in school curricula. He highlighted that LGBTQIA+ lives are an integral part of society and stressed the importance of fostering shared values such as "respect, equality, and non-discrimination" to ensure peaceful coexistence. While acknowledging that families have the right to pass on their own values, Gerges argued that schools play a vital role in promoting fundamental societal principles.

The responses of government officials left little ambiguity about their stance. Minister of Education Claude Meisch dismissed what he described as "false or made-up" arguments against discussing sexual diversity in schools. He echoed Gerges' view, emphasising that LGBTQIA+ issues are a "societal reality" that cannot be left entirely to the discretion of families.

The debate concluded with an agreement to involve parents' associations more closely in reviewing school curricula, aiming to alleviate fears that some may have.

Following the session, the two petitioners were observed engaging in a lengthy exchange.