Tripartite agreementChamber approves energy aid for households and businesses as opposition criticises government's slow response

Fanny Kinsch
adapted for RTL Today
Luxembourg's Chamber of Deputies passed three laws on Thursday to implement the tripartite agreement, introducing measures to help households and businesses cope with high energy prices.
© ROBERT SCHLESINGER/dpa Picture-Alliance via AFP

On Thursday morning, Luxembourg's Chamber of Deputies unanimously approved three laws that will enact key elements of the recent tripartite agreement. The legislation introduces measures to alleviate energy costs for households, as well as companies in the transport and agricultural sectors.

Specifically, households will benefit from a 15-cent per litre reduction in heating fuel and natural gas prices from 1 August until the end of the year. Governing parties in parliament praised the measures, arguing that the government acted swiftly and responsibly in negotiating solutions with social partners at the right moment.

However, opposition parties offered a different assessment, insisting that the need for government action had been clear much earlier. Sven Clement of the Pirate Party regrets that these bills now have to be pushed through because the government waited too long before calling a Tripartite meeting.

Georges Engel of the Luxembourg Socialist Workers' Party (LSAP) conceded that the government could not be blamed for the situation in Iran but argued that it is still responsible for the poor mood in the country, since the government "has struggled with social dialogue since the beginning".

Fred Keup of the Alternative Democratic Reform Party (ADR) added that the tripartite process was unnecessary for these measures, remarking that "it wouldn't have taken a genius to come up with these solutions, either by the government or here in parliament".

Green Party MP Sam Tanson criticised the reliance on state subsidies for energy prices, saying that no effort was made to seek alternative solutions. While the situation in 2022 was an emergency – gas prices had exploded, and there was no European gas cap – which led most neighbouring countries to intervene on fuel prices. However, today, things are different.

Marc Baum of The Left described the energy price cap as a "necessary evil" to make sure that costs for most households do not spiral out of control.

The debate also saw moments of tension, notably when Democratic Party MP Marc Hansen accused opposition lawmakers of digressing into too many different policy areas.

The Green Party put forward a motion to abolish the fuel discount scheme, but all other parties voted against it.

A second motion, calling for an analysis of possible alternative crisis measures, also failed to secure a parliamentary majority.

Back to Top
CIM LOGO