The MUDAM modern art museum's decision to remove Wim Delvoye's "chapel", an art-work the artist created for the museum, has come in for some criticism.

When word got out that the chapel installation was to be taken down, an explanation by the museum was expected. Besides the press, citizens of Luxembourg and museum visitors also wanted to know who made this decision and why.

Freeing up space

In a subsequent statement to the press, MUDAM explained that the chapel was being removed to free up an educational space. However it still wasn't revealed who made this decision.

What was seen as a lack of communication, along with criticism by the artist and political criticism sparked a national debate around Delvoye's chapel as well as speculation as to how the decision to remove it was made.

Speculation ends

All the speculation ended when new museum director Suzanne Cotter explained that she made the decision, adding that it is normal for a museum director to make decisions and changes. MUDAM isn't defined by one artist, Cotter said.

Cotter professed not to have known about Belgian artist Wim Delvoye's significance in Luxembourg - and especially to MUDAM and its former director Enrico Lunghi. Cotter rebutted accusations by the artist Wim Delvoye of a lack of transparency and communication.

Criticism for journalists and politicians

Cotter has come in for some severe criticism for the way she made this decision. As well, she has attracted journalists' ire, because of what they see as her high-handed approach. For example, by having held a press conference where no questions were allowed.

Cotter now faces a parliamentary committee which is seeking answers.

Nothing is set in stone yet. Cotter has explained that the chapel could be exhibited in other museums.


Read more about the controversy in the article in the links box below: