
© AFP
Luxembourg's government faces mounting criticism over its lack of clarity on pension reform, as MPs prepare for a key debate on the system's future scheduled for mid-March.
Minister of Health and Social Security Martine Deprez informed members of the parliamentary Health and Social Security Committee on Wednesday that a consultative debate on the long-term viability of Luxembourg's pension system will take place in the Chamber of Deputies during the week of 18 March. However, Deprez provided few additional details about the government's intentions regarding the review of the pension system.
The government's course of action remains unclear. Discussions have included proposals to strengthen company pension schemes and supplementary insurance systems. At the same time, Prime Minister Luc Frieden introduced the concept of a "cappuccino" model, a metaphor that sparked criticism from opposition members.
Mars Di Bartolomeo, MP for the Luxembourg Socialist Workers' Party (LSAP), explained that the model refers to "a little espresso with a lot of foam," where the espresso symbolises the basic pension and the foam represents benefits earned through private insurance. Di Bartolomeo criticised the government for fostering confusion through conflicting ideas, accusing it of having an unpopular stance but avoiding transparency. "The mess created by these individual positions does not help the debate," he said.
Marc Baum, MP for the Left Party (Déi Lénk), echoed these concerns, calling the situation chaotic. He noted that the only constructive step taken was assigning MPs the task of formulating questions for the General Inspectorate of Social Security (IGSS) to answer before the debate. "Aside from that, we can only confirm that the situation is a mess," Baum lamented.
Baum also criticised the withdrawal of discussions on the minimum pension. "We were told the minimum pension is not an appropriate means to combat poverty among the elderly," he said.
Djuna Bernard of the Green Party (Déi Gréng) echoed her fellow MPs' criticisms, highlighting that the committee is receiving only "fragments" of information. She expressed disappointment that, despite the issue's importance–particularly for younger generations–the government remains tight-lipped.
MP Sven Clement of the Pirate Party agreed that much of the discussion remains "in the dark." However, he welcomed Minister Deprez's assurance that MPs will receive all the necessary data ahead of the March debate.
Another announcement on Wednesday morning came at the request of the Democratic Party (DP): the March debate will not only address the private pension scheme but also include the public pension system.
Meanwhile, Marc Spautz of the Christian Social People's Party (CSV) and president of the parliamentary committee expressed bewilderment at some of the criticisms directed toward the government. Spautz argued that if the government enters a debate with a clear stance, it is accused of bypassing consultation. "No matter what the government does, it will always face criticism from the opposition," he said.
Spautz praised the Wednesday meeting, noting that "everyone was able to ask their questions, and the minister provided answers where possible." He also welcomed Minister Deprez's commitment to providing the IGSS figures by 26 February.