As nations met at the UN climate conference (COP28) in December 2023, some social media users downplayed the role of US cattle in producing greenhouse gases by comparing their population today to that of bison in the 19th century. This is misleading; experts told AFP the figures shared online are inaccurate, and data show methane produced by livestock farming is a major factor in warming the planet.
"1820: 30 million bison roam North America. Climate is normal," says a December 8, 2023 Facebook post from a page called "Climate Change is Crap."
"2020: 30 million cattle roam North America, DANGER, CLIMATE EMERGENCY! Go vegan!"
But the population numbers shared online are inaccurate, according to animal science experts -- and the climate impact of wild bison and livestock differs due to their feeding habits.
"The comparison in the tweets is misguided at best," said Ermias Kebreab, director of the World Food Center at the University of California-Davis.
He said there is no good data on historical bison populations, but "most estimates put them around 60 million." In contrast, there are about 90 million heads of cattle in the United States, according to data from the Department of Agriculture (USDA) (archived here).
"So yes, there is more methane being emitted now compared to pre-industrial levels," Kebreab said in a December 13 email.
Methane's warming roleMethane is a primary component of natural gas and represents about a third of global warming, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (archived here). It is short-lived but one of the most powerful greenhouse gases -- 28 times as potent as carbon dioxide.
The EPA says methane concentrations in the atmosphere have more than doubled over the past two centuries, largely due to human activity.
"Out of the observed increase of 1.1C in global temperatures since pre-industrial levels, about 0.5C can be attributed to methane emissions because of its potent ability to trap heat," Kebreab said.
Cattle produce methane through their digestive process (archived here), making agriculture a top contributor of the greenhouse gas. The sector's emissions rose by about 15 percent between 1990 and 2021, according to EPA data (archived here).
Different feeding habitsBeyond their population size, part of the reason modern livestock are a significant source of methane has to do with how much they eat.
"When fed similar feed, bison and cattle appear to have similar methane fluxes," said Paul Stoy, an associate professor in the Department of Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, in a December 15 email.
"We're not entirely sure if bisons had lower methane fluxes in the past as they were able to graze and eat more nutritious grasses and forbs that are easier for them to break down ... but a conservative estimate is that the fluxes are approximately the same on a per-animal basis."
However, modern cattle and bison differ in how much they consume.
"So total emissions per animal is more due to differences in intake," said Kebreab of UC-Davis.
Livestock farming has been expanding in the United States and worldwide to meet the growing demand for meat, underscoring concerns about emissions.
Since 1990, agricultural methane emissions have increased in the US largely driven by increased livestock production and the low-cost, emissions-intensive manure management techniques on large-scale dairy and swine operations, a 2022 report published by the University of Michigan states (archived here).
Scientists say cutting such emissions, as well as other greenhouse gases, is essential to limit the rise of average global temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius -- a threshold for avoiding the worst effects of climate change (archived here).
A new draft agreement at COP28 called for "accelerating and substantially reducing non-CO2 emissions, including, in particular, methane emissions globally by 2030."
AFP has debunked other false and misleading claims about climate change here.